
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting
estimates and related disclosures made by Management.
conclude on the appropriateness of Management's use of the going concern basis of accounting
in preparing the financial statements and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a
material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty
exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor's report to the related disclosures in the
financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our
conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor's report.
However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going
concern.
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the
planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant
deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
evaluate the overall presentation, structure and contents of the financial statements, including the
disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and
events in a manner that gives a true and fair view.
obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control.
Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the financial statements as a
whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an
auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but
is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs and the additional
requirements in Denmark will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements may arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of financial
statement users made on the basis of these financial statements.
As part of an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs and the additional requirements
applicable in Denmark, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism
throughout the audit. We also
identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the company financial statements,
whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and
obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The
risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting
from error as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations or
the override of internal control.
11